EVE Search - CCP making progress to a better EVE

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CCP making progress to a better EVE

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 10:48:00 - [1] - Quote D3F4ULT wrote: We've seen incursions get nerfed. We've seen the drone goop nerf. Inferno is leading up to a good hit, but the one that would knock it out of the park to making EVE a true sensation would be sending all Level 4's to Low-sec. This would indeed make things better :) Why ?
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 10:49:00 - [2] - Quote Richard Desturned wrote: Takamori Maruyama wrote: Unsubs= not good, we want to see the game expand. sorry if some of us disagree with your assessment that finding ways of bringing in truckloads of wow trash is good for the game Rather than the trash we have now ? Tal
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 10:50:00 - [3] - Quote Scatim Helicon wrote: Have all mission agents work on a supply and demand principle where the more players are running a particular agent's missions, the more he can lower his payouts to take advantage of the labour surplus, and vice versa. This would do wonders for restoring risk/reward balance as the more daring mission runners ventured out to take advantage of little-used agents in unused corners of lowsec and npc 0.0. Where all your bored little bees will be waiting ? No thanks Tal
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 11:03:00 - [4] - Quote Scatim Helicon wrote: Talon SilverHawk wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Have all mission agents work on a supply and demand principle where the more players are running a particular agent's missions, the more he can lower his payouts to take advantage of the labour surplus, and vice versa. This would do wonders for restoring risk/reward balance as the more daring mission runners ventured out to take advantage of little-used agents in unused corners of lowsec and npc 0.0. Where all your bored little bees will be waiting ? No thanks Tal Oh no the mission runners might have to take some basic precautions while they make money I dont play the game to give the bored 0.0 nubs their entertainment, I do it for mine. I'm not here to let you ruin my game, I'm here to have fun in mine. Cheers Tal
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 11:12:00 - [5] - Quote Vaju Enki wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Talon SilverHawk wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Have all mission agents work on a supply and demand principle where the more players are running a particular agent's missions, the more he can lower his payouts to take advantage of the labour surplus, and vice versa. This would do wonders for restoring risk/reward balance as the more daring mission runners ventured out to take advantage of little-used agents in unused corners of lowsec and npc 0.0. Where all your bored little bees will be waiting ? No thanks Tal Oh no the mission runners might have to take some basic precautions while they make money Well, we can't have that can we? We have to keep L4 out of the Risk vs Reward EvE Balance. We have to keep their risk free ISK fountain going. aw diddums, is me playing the sandbox in the way I want, upsetting you, awwwwwww here's a tissue. Dry your eyes mate. Tal
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 11:13:00 - [6] - Quote Vaju Enki wrote: Talon SilverHawk wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Talon SilverHawk wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Have all mission agents work on a supply and demand principle where the more players are running a particular agent's missions, the more he can lower his payouts to take advantage of the labour surplus, and vice versa. This would do wonders for restoring risk/reward balance as the more daring mission runners ventured out to take advantage of little-used agents in unused corners of lowsec and npc 0.0. Where all your bored little bees will be waiting ? No thanks Tal Oh no the mission runners might have to take some basic precautions while they make money I dont play the game to give the bored 0.0 nubs their entertainment, I do it for mine. I'm not here to let you ruin my game, I'm here to have fun in mine. Cheers Tal Good exemple of a Theme Park MMO playstyle. Lol at you and your poor trolling skills. Tal
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 11:18:00 - [7] - Quote Tell you what lets remove 0.0 sovereignty from the game, add more NPC stations to 0.0 all regions, and open up all player 0.0 stations to anyone who wants to visit . You would immediately see the 0.0 population grow. Tal
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 11:23:00 - [8] - Quote Vaju Enki wrote: They are only two possibilities, you're either a troll or you are just insanely ignorant on this subject. But then again, Theme Parkers are known for this, they don't have a clue about Sandbox MMO's, so you are probably just being ignorant. Poor child
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 11:31:00 - [9] - Quote Vaju Enki wrote: Talon SilverHawk wrote: Vaju Enki wrote: They are only two possibilities, you're either a troll or you are just insanely ignorant on this subject. But then again, Theme Parkers are known for this, they don't have a clue about Sandbox MMO's, so you are probably just being ignorant. Poor child Indeed, sucks to be you. I would be mad too if i was playing world of warcraft thinking it was a Sandbox MMO. Your right totally, sucks to be me, I had better go and biomass myself. Now run along to mummy, I think I can hear her calling you. Give her my regards
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 14:03:00 - [10] - Quote OssadaDeathLaw wrote: Talon SilverHawk wrote: Tell you what lets remove 0.0 sovereignty from the game, add more NPC stations to 0.0 all regions, and open up all player 0.0 stations to anyone who wants to visit . You would immediately see the 0.0 population grow. Tal Yep you liked that Idea as much as we liked talk of moving lvl4's. Tal
Talon SilverHawk Patria o Muerte 386	Posted - 2012.06.09 16:39:00 - [11] - Quote Jake Warbird wrote: I need l4 isk so I can PvP. Running l3s for isk is just not worthwhile. Also, someone mentioned dynamic agents where they reduce payouts and stuff? Seriously, why are you guys so worried about hisec? Hisec is fine. Run along now. This +1 Tal

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,02s, ref 20251004/0033
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.